STEPCARE

Determining best strategies through collaboration and historical evidence

Contact Spiral

The STEPCARE Trial

The STEPCARE (Sedation, Temperature and Pressure after Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation) trial aims to determine the optimal intensive care treatment for patients after arrival in hospital. This study compares strategies for using sedatives, controlling fever and blood pressure management. The STEPCARE trial intends to find out how these treatment approaches can best be implemented to give cardiac arrest patients the best chance of a good recovery, improving chances of survival and preventing neurological damage. 

Engage Early

Primary Outcome:
Survival at 180 days with the secondary outcomes including neurological function and health related quality of life.

Read about the current trial >>

“This trial is designed to enrol a broad cohort of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients who are comatose following resuscitation from cardiac arrest”

PAUL YOUNG, NATIONAL INVESTIGATOR, STEPCARE TRIAL

Case Study

“Spiral has been an amazing partner in solving many of the challenges that arose with this trial.”

Steve Webb, ICU specialist & Clinical Trialist

Learn More

Latest Results

Within the ACE2 RAS domain, an initiation of an ACE inhibitor or ARB did not improve organ support–free days for patients hospitalised for COVID-19. Among critically ill patients, there was a 95% probability that treatments worsened this outcome.

Learn more

Background

The REDUSE trial is a multi-centre, investigator-initiated, randomised clinical superiority trial comparing protocolised restrictive strategy for the administration of non-resuscitation fluids with usual care in participants with septic shock. Adult patients with septic shock will be eligible for inclusion. Participants will be randomised within six hours of admission to the intensive care unit.

In the intervention arm participants will not receive maintenance fluids unless total volume of fluid is not enough to provide hydration. All intravenous drugs and nutrition will be concentrated and administered with the objective to reduce volume of fluid. Resuscitation fluids will be administered according to local routines. The intervention will last for the duration of the intensive care unit stay. Participants in the control arm will receive usual care.

The primary outcome will be all-cause mortality at 90 days. Secondary outcomes will be complications during ICU stay, neuro-cognitive function and health-related

quality of life at 6 months, and days alive without mechanical ventilation at 90 days. Healthcare staff involved in the care of the participant will not be blinded to the intervention but participants, outcome assessors, statisticians, data managers, and conclusion drawers will be blinded to treatment allocation.

Sepsis is defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a host response to infection (Singer 2016). Recent estimates suggest that 48 million cases of sepsis occur globally every year and that 11 million sepsis-related deaths occur annually with the majority of cases occurring in developing countries (Rudd 2020). Septic shock is a subgroup of sepsis with particularly severe circulatory and metabolic abnormalities and approximately 35-50% of patients with septic shock die.

Administration of fluids is an essential component of the care of patients suffering from septic shock. Fluids are administered for different theoretical reasons. Resuscitation fluids are administered intravenously to ensure adequate tissue perfusion and oxygenation (Rhodes 2016) whereas non-resuscitation fluids are administered intravenously and enter rally as vehicles for medications, as vehicles for nutrition, to correct electrolyte disturbances, and to ensure adequate hydration (maintenance fluids). The latter purpose is considered to require a total of about 1-2 litres of fluids per day (1 ml/kg/h) in the healthy humans and may increase in pathophysiological conditions due to higher than normal losses. More than 50% of patients with septic shock receive 4 L or more of fluids in the first day in the ICU (Marik 2017).

This may be adequate in patients with pre-existing deficits, but data suggest that large volumes of fluids are not without risks. Non-randomised studies have indicated that excessive fluid administration might have detrimental adverse effects such as tissue oedema, with impaired oxygen delivery and organ function, and compartment syndromes (Boyd 2011, Payen 2008, Silversides 2018, Sakr 2017). These observations have inspired trials investigating if restrictive fluid administration improve outcomes in septic shock participants.


Trial design

  • The study will enrol adult patients with severe CAP who are admitted to ICUs using a design known as a REMAP, which is a type of platform trial.

  • Eligible participants will be randomised to receive one intervention in each of one or more domains.

  • Bayesian statistical methods will be used to establish the superiority, inferiority, or equivalence of interventions within a domain. Interventions determined to be superior will be incorporated into standard care within the ongoing REMAP. Interventions determined to be inferior will be discontinued.

  • This REMAP uses an adaptive design, relying on pre-specified criteria for adaptation.


Trial news

REMAP-CAP has been announced as one of three finalists for the Federartie Medisch Specialisten Science and Innovation Prize 2023. More on this here.


Key connections

“It is an incredibly agile environment. Whatever comes my way - I jump on it and deal with it”

Spiral’s contribution

Our Spiral Project Lead and EDC Product Owner for the STOP KNEE-OA study is Amanda Daley

As a Product Owner at Spiral, Amanda oversees software development used in clinical trials. She thrives on solving complex problems and brings a logical mindset to building smarter, streamlined digital platforms.

Meet Amanda